Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki

What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-AI-2026-022 · Evidence A · P1

The European Commission's September 2025 consultation proposed guidance and a template for serious-incident reporting under AI Act Article 73, with the relevant high-risk-system rules due to apply from August 2026.

D12 · Data, Knowledge, Search & Evidence D19 · Measurement, Experimentation & Economics

Counterevidence & uncertainty

Consultation status and phased applicability require version/date checks.

What would change the reading

Replace with final Commission guidance, templates and applicable dates when issued.

Primary routes

AI-S027https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/consultations/ai-act-commission-issues-draft-guidance-and-reporting-template-serious-ai-incidents-and-seeksOpen source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.