MWITA-BL-2026-012 · Evidence A · P1
In the Japanese autonomous-lab study, the best Bayesian-screened condition appeared 94.7% better than base medium for cell growth, but a later factor-analysis experiment under that condition was only 2.9% better; maximum growth across scale checks was 31.7% higher.
What this does not establish
The 94.7% screen result is not a stable replicated gain, industrial yield, throughput improvement or cost reduction.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
Growth measurements varied across experiments and culture scales remained small.
What would change the reading
Update with preregistered replication, industrial-scale validation and total experimental cost.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.