MWITA-PPO-2026-004 · Evidence A · P1
Exclusive listings had a 0.10 higher 90-day transaction probability and spent 8.78 fewer days on market than non-exclusive listings, with additional buyer visits identified as the mechanism.
What this does not establish
The findings cannot be presumed for MLS markets, rental portals or jurisdictions with different rules for exclusive representation.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
Despite stronger indirect network effects and faster transactions, exclusivity had no significant effect on listing or transaction prices.
What would change the reading
Track replication, revised records, denominators, confidence intervals, context changes and deployed commercial or human outcomes.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.