MWITA-YF-2026-005 · Evidence A · P1
ASER 2024 found that 23.4% of surveyed rural Indian Standard III children could read a Standard II text.
What this does not establish
This rural learning level is not a digital-product effect and does not represent all Indian children.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
Cross-sectional assessment does not identify causal drivers.
What would change the reading
Update with comparable future waves and program-linked experimental evidence.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.