MWITA-ALGP-2026-001 · Evidence A · P1
An FTC 6(b) document review of six pricing intermediaries found that their systems could use granular behavioral and contextual data to tailor prices, promotions or product ordering; the examined intermediaries worked with at least 250 clients.
What this does not establish
This is not evidence that all 250 clients used surveillance pricing, that any named consumer paid more, or that the practice improved profit or harmed welfare.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
The FTC study remained ongoing and two commissioners dissented from release of the research summaries.
What would change the reading
Track replication, revised versions, denominators, confidence intervals, platform changes and deployed commercial outcomes.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.