Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-ALGP-2026-001 · Evidence A · P1

An FTC 6(b) document review of six pricing intermediaries found that their systems could use granular behavioral and contextual data to tailor prices, promotions or product ordering; the examined intermediaries worked with at least 250 clients.

What this does not establish

This is not evidence that all 250 clients used surveillance pricing, that any named consumer paid more, or that the practice improved profit or harmed welfare.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

The FTC study remained ongoing and two commissioners dissented from release of the research summaries.

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised versions, denominators, confidence intervals, platform changes and deployed commercial outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. ALGP-S001https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-surveillance-pricing-study-indicates-wide-range-personal-data-used-set-individualized-consumerOpen source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.