MWITA-BT-2026-035 · Evidence A · P1
The benchmark authors concluded that none of the four tested applications met standards for a stand-alone smartphone diagnostic tool.
What this does not establish
The conclusion is not a regulatory decision and does not prohibit cosmetic-only image analysis.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
New versions could perform differently and require fresh validation.
What would change the reading
Regulatory clearance or prospective independent validation of a specific tool.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.