Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-CPCO-2026-005 · Evidence A · P1

Court-date text reminders reduced failure to appear by 8.0 percentage points from a 37.9% control rate (21% relative; p<0.001); the message combining logistical and consequence information reduced it by 9.9 points.

What this does not establish

The result does not show that reminders replace legal assistance, address structural inequities, or work identically for felony cases or people without stable phone access.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

Consequence information improved attendance, yet the study argues many missed dates reflect inattention rather than deliberate deterrence calculus; punishment severity alone is not the tested mechanism.

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised records, denominators, confidence intervals, context changes and deployed commercial, civic or human outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. CPCO-S005https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6591Open source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.