Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-NCO-2026-004 · Evidence A · P1

Two weeks of immersive virtual-movement therapy reduced neuropathic pain more than a headset-based 2D-film control among spinal-cord-injury patients who completed the trial.

What this does not establish

This is short-term completer evidence with 9/52 attrition, concurrent standard care and no long-term follow-up. It does not measure adoption, adherence after the trial, medication reduction, QALYs, employment, cost, revenue or profit.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

Control patients also improved materially; neurological-level subgroup comparisons were nonsignificant, including the largest T9-T12 pain change (p=0.109; CI crossed zero).

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised denominators, uncertainty, persistence and realized behavioral, commercial or welfare outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. NCO-S004https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2514321Open source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.