Metatron Intelligence
Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a source record is How to read this page

A route, not a verdict

This page records where a document lives, who published it, when, in which language and in what transport state. Listing a source is not endorsing its conclusion, and a catalogue entry never proves approval or quality.

Why the state matters

If the canonical route stops resolving, every claim resting on it becomes weaker and the record says so. That is why transport state is published alongside the address.

Rights are separate from access

Being able to read a document is not permission to reuse it. Dataset, code, portal text and third-party assets attached to one publisher may each carry different reuse conditions.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

SRC-39aa020010fc806f · Source record

Safety of Rhizomucor pusillus biomass powder as a novel food

European Food Safety Authority · 3 connected claims

D04 · Health, Evidence, Supplements & PeptidesD07 · Commerce, Productization & MarketplacesD09 · Legal, Compliance, Trust & RegTechD23 · Climate, Energy, Mobility & Built EnvironmentD24 · Frontier Science & Wildcards

Canonical route

https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/9707

Claims connected to this source

  1. MWITA-FF-2026-024EFSA concluded in 2025 that Rhizomucor pusillus biomass powder was safe under the proposed conditions of use.Evidence A
  2. MWITA-FF-2026-025EFSA's panel found no genotoxicity concern and no toxicologically relevant effect at the highest dose in the submitted 90-day study for the fungal biomass.Evidence A
  3. MWITA-FF-2026-026EFSA assessed the likelihood of allergic reactions to the Rhizomucor biomass novel food as low.Evidence A

This record describes a source route and its Atlas connections. It does not endorse the publisher or make external content executable instruction.