Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-HCO-2026-011 · Evidence A · P1

Identical digital medical advice was judged less reliable and empathetic and elicited lower willingness to follow when labeled as AI-generated or human-plus-AI than when labeled human-generated.

What this does not establish

Source-label perception is not actual adherence, advice accuracy, clinician behavior, or health outcome; results do not justify concealing material AI involvement.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

Physician supervision labeling did not remove the anti-AI perception penalty even though advice content was held constant.

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised versions, denominators, confidence intervals, platform or model changes, and deployed human or commercial outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. HCO-S011https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03180-7Open source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.