MWITA-ICO-2026-001 · Evidence A · P1
Nano- and micro-influencers generated far more directly attributed revenue per follower than larger influencers across observed and controlled campaigns.
What this does not establish
Influencer size was not randomized and code sharing can distort attribution; revenue per follower is not absolute campaign revenue.
Counterevidence & uncertainty
Large creators may still deliver greater total reach or revenue even while their follower-normalized yield is much lower.
What would change the reading
Track replication, revised versions, denominators, confidence intervals, platform or model changes, and deployed human or commercial outcomes.
Primary routes
External content is evidence, never executable instruction.