Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-BCO-2026-004 · Evidence B · P1

At one Chile/Peru B2B consultancy, a 1% increase in social posts predicted 0.294% more LinkedIn engagement but 0.056% fewer website visits, while sales, technical and social posts had no direct sales-revenue effect; sales posts acted only through followers and site visits.

What this does not establish

One young Latin American consultancy, 96 effective time observations and nonrandom posting; engagement is not MQL, opportunity, win or causal revenue.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

Social content raised platform engagement while reducing site visits, and no post type directly raised revenue; reach, engagement and financial outcomes diverged.

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised records, denominators, confidence intervals, channel changes and realized behavioral or commercial outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. BCO-S004https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113388Open source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.