Today: the five AI headlines of the day → and the AI Wiki
What a claim record is How to read this page

One statement, bounded on purpose

The headline is a single claim that a named source supports. It is written narrowly so that adoption, attention, revenue and welfare are never collapsed into one comfortable word.

The three sections below the fold

What this does not establish is the boundary of the evidence. Counterevidence & uncertainty is what argues the other way. What would change the reading is the observation that would move it. A record missing any of the three is incomplete, not merely brief.

Primary routes are checkable

Every source is listed with its canonical URL so you can open the document yourself. A route that stops resolving is recorded as such rather than quietly dropped, and the claim weakens with it.

New to this publication?

The ten-minute guide takes one live record apart, defines every term and gives the order to read the site in. Start here →

MWITA-BCO-2026-001 · Evidence B · P1

Among 784 consulting key accounts, digital-event attendance and owned digital-content consumption predicted more sales leads and won opportunities, whereas in-person-event attendance was null; digital-event association with wins was stronger among senior account employees.

What this does not establish

Existing key accounts of one century-old consulting brand; observational engagement and invitation selection prevent causal attribution, and opportunity counts are not contract value or revenue.

Counterevidence & uncertainty

In-person events were null while digital touchpoints predicted downstream outcomes; seniority mattered more for digital-event wins than for lead creation.

What would change the reading

Track replication, revised records, denominators, confidence intervals, channel changes and realized behavioral or commercial outcomes.

Primary routes

  1. BCO-S001https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.006Open source record →

External content is evidence, never executable instruction.